Skip to content

No LGPL-2.0 #946

Open
Open

Description

@Wallby

E.g. gtk 3 is licensed w. the library GPL so it seems relevant.

Activity

  1. mlinksva commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @mlinksva
    Contributor
  2. mlinksva commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @mlinksva
    Contributor

    Oh I see you mean LGPL-2.0 prior to being renamed "Lesser"; fine with me to add, feel free to submit a PR.

  3. changed the title [-]No library GPL[/-] [+]No LGPL-2.0[/+] on Jun 4, 2022
  4. Pukimaa commented on Sep 24, 2022

    @Pukimaa
    Contributor

    The official name is "GNU Library General Public License v2 or later". So I guess the rules of LGPL3 and 2 are the same?

  5. Pacerier commented on Jul 17, 2023

    @Pacerier

    @Pukimaa, yes "the rules" can mean anything, but no the text is different.

  6. Pacerier commented on Jul 17, 2023

    @Pacerier

    @Pukimaa re "official" [for LGPL-2.0-or-later]; that's the official spdx name. The official name is "GNU Lesser General Public License" though it was "GNU Library General Public License".

  7. Tarekchehahde commented on Jul 11, 2026

    @Tarekchehahde

    Opened #1359 — adds hidden LGPL-2.0 page, SPDX text, using examples, and links from LGPL-2.1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions