Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
或许是数据量太小了 |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
我使用
juicefs sync ~/jfs/test/ ~/jfs-local/bench-2kb-100-local/ --no-https和juicefs sync s3://admin:password@demo.localhost:8888/test/ ~/jfs-local/jfs-local/bench-2kb-100-s3/ --no-https命令,分别做了100个2KB小文件、300个2KB小文件、1000个2KB小文件的对照试验,发现整体sync耗时差不多I used the command
juicefs sync ~/jfs/test/ ~/jfs-local/bench-2kb-100-local/ --no-httpsandjuicefs sync s3://admin:password@demo.localhost:8888/test/ ~/jfs-local/jfs-local/bench-2kb-100-s3/ --no-httpsto conduct controlled experiments with 100 small files of 2KB, 300 small files of 2KB, and 1000 small files of 2KB respectively, and found that the overall sync took about the same amount of time.All reactions