Skip to content

docs: adopt the [tool.verifiers.eval] convention - #9

Merged
xeophon merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/eval-convention
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

xeophon merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/eval-convention

Conversation

@snimu

@snimu snimu commented Aug 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adds the [tool.verifiers.eval] convention in preparation for the automated PR-eval action:

  • AGENTS.md: every environment declares its full-eval convention (num_examples, rollouts_per_example) in pyproject.toml; automated eval runs read it when no sample count is given; infinite tasksets fall back to 50 examples.

Same convention as prime-envs already uses (e.g. environments/multimodal/mmk12).


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only change to AGENTS.md with no runtime or config edits in this PR.

Overview
Documents the [tool.verifiers.eval] convention in AGENTS.md so contributors know how full evals are configured before automated PR-eval runs land.

The new rule states that every environment must set num_examples and rollouts_per_example in pyproject.toml. When automated eval runs omit an explicit sample count, they use those values; infinite tasksets default to 50 examples.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6476f69. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Document the [tool.verifiers.eval] convention for environment eval configuration

Updates AGENTS.md to require every environment to declare its full-eval settings in pyproject.toml under [tool.verifiers.eval], specifying num_examples and rollouts_per_example. Automated eval runs read this config when no sample count is supplied; infinite tasksets default to 50 examples.

Macroscope summarized 6476f69.

@snimu
snimu marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2026 12:54
@snimu
snimu requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2026 12:54
@xeophon
xeophon merged commit 486acae into main Aug 17, 2026
12 checks passed
@xeophon
xeophon deleted the chore/eval-convention branch August 17, 2026 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants