Skip to content

Open WebUI: Redirect-Bypass SSRF in OAuth `_process_picture_url` (incomplete-fix sibling of CVE-2026-45401)

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 11, 2026 in open-webui/open-webui • Updated Jun 17, 2026

Package

pip open-webui (pip)

Affected versions

<= 0.9.5

Patched versions

0.9.6

Description

Summary

backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py::_process_picture_url (v0.9.5, lines 1435-1470) calls validate_url(picture_url) on the initial URL only, then invokes aiohttp.ClientSession.get(picture_url, ...) without allow_redirects=False. aiohttp's default is allow_redirects=True, max_redirects=10; the function does not pass the project's AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS env constant either. An attacker with a valid OAuth IdP identity can therefore submit a public URL that 302-redirects to an internal address and read the internal response body via the attacker's own profile_image_url field.

This is the same redirect-bypass class as CVE-2026-45401 (GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6), on a 6th call site that the v0.9.5 patch missed. CVE-2026-45401's advisory body enumerates exactly five affected paths — SafeWebBaseLoader._scrape, _fetch, get_content_from_url, load_url_image, get_image_base64_from_url — none in utils/oauth.py.

Vulnerable code (v0.9.5)

backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py, lines 1435-1470:

async def _process_picture_url(self, picture_url: str, access_token: str = None) -> str:
    if not picture_url:
        return '/user.png'
    try:
        validate_url(picture_url)                              # initial URL only

        get_kwargs = {}
        if access_token:
            get_kwargs['headers'] = {'Authorization': f'Bearer {access_token}'}
        async with aiohttp.ClientSession(trust_env=True) as session:
            async with session.get(picture_url, **get_kwargs,
                                   ssl=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_SESSION_SSL) as resp:
            #                       ^^^^^^^^^^^ no allow_redirects=False
                if resp.ok:
                    picture = await resp.read()
                    base64_encoded_picture = base64.b64encode(picture).decode('utf-8')
                    guessed_mime_type = mimetypes.guess_type(picture_url)[0]
                    if guessed_mime_type is None:
                        guessed_mime_type = 'image/jpeg'
                    return f'data:{guessed_mime_type};base64,{base64_encoded_picture}'
                ...

The function is invoked at oauth.py:1556 (new-user OAuth signup) and oauth.py:1536 (existing-user picture update on login). Neither call site re-validates after redirect-following.

backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py (v0.9.5) imports the env constant AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS at line 51 and uses it on the five paths patched by CVE-2026-45401. utils/oauth.py does not import or reference it.

Exploitation

Preconditions:

  • ENABLE_OAUTH_SIGNUP=true or OAUTH_UPDATE_PICTURE_ON_LOGIN=true (common in production OAuth-IdP deployments)
  • Attacker has a valid identity on the configured OAuth IdP (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, or any generic OIDC provider)

Steps:

  1. Attacker hosts a redirect endpoint at http://attacker.example/r on a public IP. validate_url("http://attacker.example/r") returns True (is_global=True for public IPs).
  2. Attacker sets their IdP picture claim to http://attacker.example/r.
  3. Attacker signs in to open-webui via OAuth. open-webui invokes _process_picture_url("http://attacker.example/r", ...).
  4. validate_url accepts the public URL. session.get("http://attacker.example/r") is invoked.
  5. attacker.example responds HTTP/1.1 302 Found\r\nLocation: http://127.0.0.1:11434/api/tags. (Or http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/, RFC1918 internal services, etc.)
  6. aiohttp follows the redirect server-side. No re-validation.
  7. The internal response body is read into picture, base64-encoded, and stored as profile_image_url = "data:image/jpeg;base64,..." on the attacker's account.
  8. Attacker reads back via GET /api/v1/auths/. Decode the base64 payload to get the full internal response body.

Impact

Full-read SSRF, identical read-back primitive to CVE-2026-45338:

  • Cloud metadata services (AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254, GCP metadata.google.internal, Azure IMDS) → IAM credentials, managed-identity tokens
  • Localhost-bound services (Ollama at :11434, Redis, Elasticsearch, internal Postgres exporters)
  • RFC1918 internal infrastructure not exposed to the internet

Distinction from prior CVEs

Prior CVE This finding Distinguishing fact
CVE-2026-45338 (GHSA-24c9) _process_picture_url had no validate_url() call at all Fixed in v0.9.0 by adding the call. Ours is the call being insufficient because it doesn't loop over redirect targets. Different mechanism, different fix.
CVE-2026-45400 (GHSA-8w7q) validate_url() had urlparse-vs-requests parser disagreement on \@ chars Fixed in v0.9.5 by char-blocklist. Ours is post-validation redirect-following — orthogonal mechanism.
CVE-2026-45401 (GHSA-rh5x) Five paths in retrieval, routers/images, utils/files, utils/middleware Parent class. Same CWE-918 redirect-bypass mechanism. utils/oauth.py::_process_picture_url is not among the five paths in the parent advisory's "Affected code paths" section. Same class, missed sink. Direct sibling.

Suggested fix

async with session.get(
    picture_url,
    **get_kwargs,
    ssl=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_SESSION_SSL,
    allow_redirects=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS,   # add
) as resp:

Or, if redirects must remain enabled by default, wrap in a manual-follow loop that re-invokes validate_url() on each Location header. This mirrors the fix shape applied to the five paths in CVE-2026-45401.

Affected versions

Vulnerable: <= 0.9.5
Fix: 0.9.6

References

Proof of Concept

End-to-end PoC executed against ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.9.5 in Docker compose. Three services: attacker (OIDC IdP + 302-redirect endpoint on evil.example.com:9001/redirect), canary (internal target on internal-target.local:9002/sentinel), open-webui v0.9.5.

Fresh-CSPRNG sentinel generated after OAuth state-establishing call (per Gate 5.5 oracle protocol): SSRF-POC-5580111b2a0d7d0c8324bfa92a0d9d09.

Result:

  • profile_image_url field after OAuth login: 
  • Base64 decode: SSRF-POC-5580111b2a0d7d0c8324bfa92a0d9d09 (byte-for-byte sentinel match)
  • Canary log: !!! SSRF HIT - sentinel served

Chain confirmed: OAuth login → IdP returns picture claim evil.example.com:9001/redirect → validate_url() accepts FQDN → aiohttp.ClientSession.get(...) follows 302 to internal-target.local:9002/sentinel server-side without re-validation → response body base64-encoded into attacker's profile_image_url → readable via GET /api/v1/auths/.

PoC artifacts (compose, attacker server, canary, run/verify scripts, full transcript) available on request.

Reporter

Matteo Panzeri — GitHub: matte1782, contact: matteo1782@gmail.com. Requesting CVE credit as Matteo Panzeri.

References

@doge-woof doge-woof published to open-webui/open-webui Jun 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 17, 2026
Reviewed Jun 17, 2026
Last updated Jun 17, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(26th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54008

GHSA ID

GHSA-226f-f24g-524w

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.