Skip to content

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 31, 2026 in rclone/rclone

Package

gomod github.com/rclone/rclone (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.75.0

Patched versions

1.75.0

Description

1. Summary

A valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel. The dependency does not reject CR or LF in command arguments, so a filename can inject an independent authenticated command. A real test server observed the injected DELE command.

The default FTP encoding and the configuration-wizard examples include Ctl and are not vulnerable to the demonstrated filename. A manual custom encoding that omits Ctl/CrLf is mandatory and is reflected as High attack complexity. The credible trust boundary is a lower-trust source namespace feeding a more-privileged FTP destination: if the attacker already has equivalent rights on that destination, the report establishes a bug but no privilege gain. Protocol framing must still be enforced at the command sink because a filename-compatibility encoder is not a safe substitute for command-argument validation.

2. Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • Verified rclone revision: a0c09f1381ae93e2a9a33c529d170186c61ad058 (v1.74.0-240-ga0c09f138)
  • Current-master check: the relevant paths remained present at commit 961266888fe797390c535386f3b3aa46f4853602 on 2026-07-18
  • rclone FTP encoding: backend/ftp/ftp.go:232-248, 768-785
  • Encoder masks/conversion: lib/encoder/encoder.go:36-68, 121-152, 1144-1165
  • FTP command sinks: backend/ftp/ftp.go:1071-1173, 1309-1428
  • Dependency: github.com/jlaffaye/ftp@v0.2.1-0.20251026020404-6602e981a1bb
  • Dependency command formatting: ftp.go:604-610, with path-bearing callers at ftp.go:893-947, 1010-1026, and 1069-1080
  • Preconditions: an attacker can create a filename in a source namespace, the victim copies/syncs it to an FTP destination with greater authority, and that destination uses a manually configured encoding that leaves CR/LF raw
  • Platform note: Unix and some remote backends can supply newline-bearing names; a local Windows source cannot create the demonstrated filename

3. Technical Root Cause Analysis

Rclone represents control characters safely in its internal Standard encoding. Immediately before an FTP operation, FromStandardPath decodes that representation and applies the configured backend mask. If the mask omits Ctl/CrLf, raw newlines are restored. The dependency then formats the resulting argument onto a CRLF-delimited control stream through textproto.Conn.Cmd without validating it. Reversible filename representation is therefore being used as the only protection for a protocol-command boundary.

4. Proof-of-Concept & Evidence

The source filename was equivalent to:

victim\r\nDELE other-secret\r\nNOOP

With the default encoding, no raw newline reached the command. With the valid nondefault configuration encoding = Slash, FromStandardPath restored raw CRLF. During a real FTP path operation, the server parsed DELE other-secret as an independent authenticated command. This establishes injection, not merely unsafe serialization. The test did not establish confidentiality impact or operating-system command execution.

5. Impact Assessment

Injected commands run with the configured FTP account's permissions. Demonstrated direct impact is deletion of a different path, with corresponding integrity and availability loss inside that account. Other FTP filesystem commands may be reachable, but confidentiality and arbitrary operating-system command execution are not claimed. The privilege-boundary case requires the victim's FTP account to have more authority than the attacker has in the source namespace.

6. Remediation Guidance

  • Reject CR and LF in every FTP command argument at the lowest command-construction boundary.
  • Apply the check to paths, usernames, passwords, rename arguments, and all other formatted fields.
  • Return an error rather than silently normalizing an unsafe argument.
  • Keep the default encoder protection as defense in depth and reject an FTP encoding configuration that can restore CR/LF.
  • Add end-to-end tests for CR, LF, CRLF, and each path command.

References

@ncw ncw published to rclone/rclone Jul 31, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 5, 2026
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(33rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-71311

GHSA ID

GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.