Skip to content

CedarJava has type confusion vulnerability

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 18, 2026 in cedar-policy/cedar-java • Updated Jul 28, 2026

Package

maven com.cedarpolicy:cedar-java (Maven)

Affected versions

< 2.3.6
>= 3.1.2, < 3.4.1
>= 4.0.0, < 4.9.0

Patched versions

2.3.6
3.4.1
4.9.0

Description

Summary

CedarJava is an open source Java implementation of the Cedar policy language, used for fine-grained authorization decisions. Under certain circumstances, improper input handling could allow type confusion across the Java-Rust FFI boundary.

Impact

Record-to-Entity type confusion across the Java-Rust FFI boundary

CedarJava sends authorization requests to the Rust cedar-policy evaluator as JSON. The JSON protocol reserves magic single-key object shapes (__entity and __extn) for entity references and extension values. When serializing a CedarMap, there is no validation preventing these reserved keys from being used. If an integrating service builds a CedarMap from caller-supplied key/value data (such as request headers, user-defined metadata, or resource tags), an actor who controls those keys could cause the Rust evaluator to interpret a record as an entity reference.

This issue requires the integrating service to build a CedarMap where the an actor controls the keys, and a policy must reference that value in a when/unless clause.

Impacted versions:

< 4.9

Patches

Addressed in CedarJava version 2.3.6, 3.4.1, and 4.9 and above. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

Enable schema-based request validation to catch type mismatches. Validate that user-controlled data does not contain reserved keys (__entity or __extn) before building CedarMap objects.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, we ask that you contact us directly via email to cedar-policy-security@lists.cncf.io. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

References

@muditchaudhary muditchaudhary published to cedar-policy/cedar-java Jun 18, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 19, 2026
Reviewed Jun 19, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 13, 2026
Last updated Jul 28, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(41st percentile)

Weaknesses

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55772

GHSA ID

GHSA-93g4-m6xv-cmvr
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.