Skip to content

Echo static file middleware route protection bypass via encoded dot-dot traversal

Moderate
vishr published GHSA-3pmx-cf9f-34xr Sep 27, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/labstack/echo/v4 (Go)

Affected versions

< 4.16.0

Patched versions

4.16.0
gomod github.com/labstack/echo/v5 (Go)
< 5.4.0
5.4.0

Description

Summary

Echo v5.2.0 contains a bypass of the fix for GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq. The fix rejects encoded path separators such as %2F and %5C before static file path unescaping, but two traversal forms still bypass route-level middleware protections for static files.

The primary bypass uses encoded dot-dot segments. A request such as /public/%2E%2E/admin/secret.txt passes the encoded-separator guard, is unescaped to public/../admin/secret.txt, then path.Clean resolves it to admin/secret.txt. If /admin/* is protected by middleware but the static filesystem is mounted at /, the protected file is returned through the public static route.

A second bypass exists when UseEscapedPathForMatching=true. In that mode, the router normalizes encoded separators before the static handler checks the wildcard. The handler receives a decoded wildcard with no % characters, so the encoded-separator guard does not run on the original encoded path.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can read files that an application intended to protect with route-level middleware, when those files are also reachable through a static filesystem mount after path normalization.

The high-severity variant works with the default router configuration and requires only encoded dot-dot path segments. The direct protected route returns 403, while the public static route returns the protected file content.

The UseEscapedPathForMatching=true variant is lower severity because it requires a non-default router configuration.

Affected versions

Tested vulnerable:

  • github.com/labstack/echo/v5 v5.2.0
  • Current master at 5786024ea4d85c01784796e8aa7aac53e007b39b

No patched version is currently known.

Policy and version checks

GitHub Private Vulnerability Reporting is enabled for labstack/echo. The repository has a root SECURITY.md and accepts security reports through GitHub Security Advisories.

The vulnerable code was revalidated on both current master and the latest release tag:

  • Current master: 5786024ea4d85c01784796e8aa7aac53e007b39b
  • Latest release: v5.2.0, published June 14 2026
  • Package: github.com/labstack/echo/v5

The same focused Go tests pass on the checked out v5.2.0 / master commit, proving the bypass remains present in the latest released version and latest main branch at the time of reporting.

Reproduction

The following application shape reproduces the high-severity bypass:

e := echo.New()

g := e.Group("/admin", func(next echo.HandlerFunc) echo.HandlerFunc {
    return func(c echo.Context) error {
        return echo.NewHTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
    }
})
g.GET("/*", handler)

e.StaticFS("/", fsysWithAdminSecret)

Control request:

GET /admin/secret.txt

Observed result:

403 Forbidden

Bypass request:

GET /public/%2E%2E/admin/secret.txt

Observed result:

200 OK
TOP-SECRET

For the non-default router variant:

e := echo.New()
e.router = echo.NewRouter(echo.RouterConfig{
    UseEscapedPathForMatching: true,
})

g := e.Group("/admin", authMiddlewareReturning403)
g.GET("/*", handler)

e.StaticFS("/", fsysWithAdminSecret)

Bypass request:

GET /public%2F..%2Fadmin%2Fsecret.txt

Observed result:

200 OK
TOP-SECRET

Proof of concept evidence

I added focused tests against the current Echo codebase. The tests exercise both StaticDirectoryHandler and the static middleware path.

Command:

go test -run TestHostile -v ./...

Observed result:

=== RUN   TestHostile_StaticDirectoryHandler_EncodedSeparatorsBlocked
--- PASS: TestHostile_StaticDirectoryHandler_EncodedSeparatorsBlocked (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestHostile_StaticDirectoryHandler_EncodedDotDotBypass
--- PASS: TestHostile_StaticDirectoryHandler_EncodedDotDotBypass (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestHostile_UseEscapedPathForMatching_Bypass
--- PASS: TestHostile_UseEscapedPathForMatching_Bypass (0.00s)
PASS
ok  github.com/labstack/echo/v5  0.013s
=== RUN   TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_EncodedSeparatorsBlocked
--- PASS: TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_EncodedSeparatorsBlocked (0.01s)
=== RUN   TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_EncodedDotDotBypass
--- PASS: TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_EncodedDotDotBypass (0.00s)
=== RUN   TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_DisablePathUnescaping
--- PASS: TestHostile_StaticMiddleware_DisablePathUnescaping (0.00s)
PASS
ok  github.com/labstack/echo/v5/middleware  0.012s

The control tests also confirm that the new fix blocks encoded separators such as %2F, %5C, double-encoded slash values, null bytes, and overlong slash encodings.

Root cause

The fix for GHSA-vfp3 uses a denylist-style guard that checks for encoded path separators before unescaping the static wildcard. This blocks %2F and %5C, but does not block encoded traversal segments such as %2E%2E.

The vulnerable flow is:

  1. The static route wildcard accepts public/%2E%2E/admin/secret.txt.
  2. The encoded-separator guard sees no %2F or %5C and allows the request.
  3. The handler unescapes the wildcard to public/../admin/secret.txt.
  4. path.Clean resolves it to admin/secret.txt.
  5. The file is served through the public static route instead of the protected /admin/* route.

For UseEscapedPathForMatching=true, the router decodes the path before the static handler sees the wildcard, so the handler cannot detect that encoded separators were used in the original request.

Remediation

Do not rely only on detecting encoded separators. Reject encoded traversal sequences before unescaping, and reject normalized wildcard values that cross route or static mount boundaries.

Possible fixes:

  1. Extend the pre-unescape guard to reject encoded dot segments such as %2E and %2E%2E in path components.
  2. After unescaping, reject any wildcard where cleaning changes the path in a way that removes . or .. components.
  3. For UseEscapedPathForMatching=true, run the static-file guard against the original escaped request path before router normalization, or preserve metadata that the matched wildcard came from encoded separators.

Patches

Fixed in github.com/labstack/echo/v5 v5.4.0 and github.com/labstack/echo/v4 v4.16.0. The Static middleware and StaticDirectoryHandler (used by Echo.Static, Echo.StaticFS, Group.Static and Group.StaticFS) no longer serve paths with a ., .. or empty segment, including after path unescaping. The encoded variant of the first vector (/public/%2E%2E/admin/secret.txt) was already fixed in v5.2.1 and v4.15.4 (GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq).

Workarounds

Put a reverse proxy in front of the application that normalizes request paths (removes dot segments and merges slashes), or keep protected files outside the served directory.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-118654

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits