Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The authored periodic-review reference listed monitoring values without their metric names or inclusive threshold boundaries, and omitted the exact metric identity from issue descriptions. This obscures what the numbers measure and falls short of the existing house policy's scope requirements. The previous checker passed because it checked synthetic rule calculations rather than these report bindings.
Add all three metric names, available observation dates, inclusive limits and both exact issue scopes. Clarify that the 0.03 observation is a calibration error in probability units, not a predicted default probability. The reference remains 650 words excluding its identity appendix, below the existing 850-word limit. Extend only fixed-reference source correspondences and eight targeted mutations; this is not a general prose evaluator.
All 35 offline source commands pass, including twenty inherited unit tests. All 455 other original files and all 32 component-package files remain identical. No agreement, input packet, numerical observation, runtime behavior or reusable definition changes. No financial or provider calls occurred; reporting and assessment remain agent-unqualified.
Draft stacked on #39. No merge or release requested.